Same-day intelligence on AI export controls, AI regulations, and policy developments.

Get plain-English legal and compliance summaries organized by ECCN, entity, and regulatory source across US and China actions that affect AI chips, models, and deployment risk.

You’re in. Your first digest arrives this week.

  • Export controls and AI regulations tracked
  • Latest US and China policy developments
  • Built for legal and compliance teams

Coverage scope

We monitor export controls, AI regulations, and fast-moving policy developments from BIS, OFAC, CFIUS, MIIT, MOFCOM, and related authorities affecting AI chips, AI models, ECCNs, and listed entities.

BIS issues FAQ guidance clarifying aggregation logic for AI accelerator cluster performance thresholds.

Implication: borderline server SKUs need re-validation before quarter-end exports.

US agencies publish draft AI incident-reporting and recordkeeping guidance for high-capability model deployment.

Implication: align legal, security, and product logs to meet expected audit and disclosure standards.

China issues an AI governance bulletin updating model filing enforcement and provincial inspection priorities.

Implication: update launch timelines and local partner obligations before public model rollout.

Sample intelligence brief

See how coverage spans AI policy, regulation, and export controls

Every update is organized by regulatory source, scope, and operational impact so legal, trade, policy, and engineering teams can act quickly across export controls, AI rulemaking, and related enforcement signals.

Sample policy and compliance memo

BIS proposes expanded end-use controls for advanced AI model training clusters using U.S.-origin accelerators

Date:
31 July 2026

Executive summary

BIS is proposing a licensing framework that would treat certain foreign AI training deployments as controlled end uses when they rely on large volumes of U.S.-origin compute. The proposal focuses on aggregate performance thresholds, not only chip model names, and would require exporters and cloud providers to apply enhanced due diligence when capacity is routed through intermediaries. In our coverage model, this sits alongside same-week tracking of AI governance obligations, regulator guidance, and cross-border policy actions that can shift compliance priorities even when no new export rule is finalized.

Practical implications

  • Re-map active GPU supply contracts by ECCN and origin so aggregate cluster exposure can be measured, not just individual shipment risk.
  • Run a single intake workflow for export controls and AI regulatory obligations so account reviews capture training scale, jurisdictional triggers, and beneficial control.
  • Set a weekly cross-functional review cadence to align trade counsel, product policy, and launch teams on licensing timelines, guidance updates, and enforcement risk.
Get the free weekly digest

Plan comparison

Pick the coverage depth that matches your compliance workload

Four tiers, one view: compare cadence, archive depth, alerts, and deployment fit in under a minute.

Free

For evaluation

$0/mo

Anyone assessing AI regulatory intelligence fit.

Start free
Cadence
Weekly digest
Scope
Public tracker + core summaries
Archive
Not included
Alerts
RSS access

Recommended

Pro

For core compliance

$49/moor $470/yr

Compliance officers and consultants needing daily signal.

Become a founding subscriber
Cadence
Daily + weekly recap
Archive
Historical + memos
Alerts
ECCN, Entity, regulation search
Seats
1

Team

For shared workflows

$199/moor $1,990/yr

Compliance teams managing routing and collaboration.

Talk to sales
Cadence
Daily + team routing
Archive
Archive + memos + report
Alerts
Priority + Slack
Seats
5 included

Enterprise

For global programs

$600–$1,500/mo

Multinationals, banks, and insurers with complex governance.

Contact enterprise
Cadence
Priority daily + executive routing
Governance
Coverage + custom mapping
Integrations
Custom alert architecture
API
Included

Who it’s for

Built for legal and compliance officers and legal and compliance teams managing AI regulatory and export-control exposure.

If your role depends on fast, defensible interpretation of export controls, AI regulations, and policy actions across major agencies, this is designed for legal and compliance workflows at both individual and team levels.

  • Legal and compliance officers and teams

    Need same-day summaries across export controls, AI regulations, and enforcement signals they can route into controls, reviews, and audit trails.

  • Trade counsel

    Need precise, plain-English treatment of agency actions and AI policy updates to support fast advisory calls.

  • Export control specialists

    Need structured tracking by ECCN, entity, licensing impact, and adjacent AI policy changes without manual collation.

  • Sanctions and risk teams

    Need monitoring that connects cross-regime controls, AI policy developments, and enforcement risk before decisions escalate.

  • Operators at affected AI companies

    Need actionable updates tied to products, suppliers, and go-to-market execution risk across export, regulatory, and policy change.

FAQ

Questions before you subscribe

Direct answers on scope, differentiation, billing flexibility, and legal boundaries.

How is this different from standard law-firm alerts?
We are built for operational speed and structure: same-day tracking across export controls, AI regulations, and policy developments, organized by ECCN, entity, and regulatory regime so teams can assess impact quickly instead of parsing broad narrative updates.
Do you only cover U.S. and China export controls?
No. U.S. and China export controls are core, but coverage also tracks adjacent AI regulatory and policy developments relevant to compliance teams, including governance rules, enforcement signals, and cross-border policy shifts with source-linked context.
Can paid subscriptions be canceled anytime?
Yes. Paid plans are month-to-month and can be canceled at any time from your account settings; access remains active through the current billing period.
Is this service legal advice?
No. The tracker provides regulatory intelligence across export controls, AI regulations, and policy developments, not legal advice. Organizations should apply the information through internal counsel and jurisdiction-specific legal review.